← Back to Projects
Design CAD Simulation Marine SESM3029 — University of Southampton

Underwater CTD Sensor —
Construction Surveying

Concept design and CAD development of a pressure-rated CTD (Conductivity, Temperature, Depth) instrument for surveying underwater construction sites to 300m. Designed to operate in tandem with a solar-powered surface buoy, balancing pressure resistance, corrosion resistance, and serviceability against a tight manufacturing budget.

ModuleSESM3029
CAD ToolSolidWorks
Material6061-T6 Aluminium
Depth Rating300m / 30.4 bar
Year2026
Assembled CAD render of the underwater CTD sensor housing
300m
Depth Rating
30.4 bar
Hydrostatic Pressure
Ø120×370mm
Envelope
4.59kg
Total Mass
1 yr
Design Endurance

Surveying the seabed before you build on it

CTDs measure conductivity (a proxy for salinity), temperature, and depth — three readings that underpin almost every piece of marine engineering advice, from material selection to corrosion protection strategy. This instrument was scoped for a specific use case: surveying shallow-water construction sites to a maximum depth of 300m, ahead of underwater build work.

Rather than designing a fully self-contained instrument, the CTD was scoped as one half of a two-part system. A solar-powered surface buoy (referenced against the commercially available VIKING platform) handles power generation, primary data logging, and satellite telemetry — functions that are far easier to provide at atmospheric pressure than 300m down. The submerged pod is reduced to the minimum it needs: sensors, a microcontroller, local backup storage, and power conditioning.

That split was the key early decision. It meant the pressure housing didn't need to carry batteries, solar circuitry, or a transmitter — so it could stay small, simple, and cheap to seal, while the buoy above sustains the system indefinitely.

The CTD staged in shallow coastal water on rocks, ahead of deployment
Fig. 1 — The CTD staged in shallow coastal water ahead of deployment to its working depth.
CAD render of the CTD with the end cap removed, showing the internal support frame
Fig. 2 — The CTD with its end cap removed, revealing the internal support frame and sensor mounting points.

A three-section cylindrical pressure vessel

The housing follows a modular three-piece architecture: a bottom cap carrying the exposed sensors, a centre body forming the sealed dry compartment for the electronics, and a top cap providing the cable/tether interface. The cylindrical profile was chosen deliberately — it's the most efficient geometry for resisting uniform external hydrostatic loading, and it simplifies both manufacture and sensor integration compared to a more complex hull form.

The conductivity probe sits in a recessed pocket at the base, with a 5mm gap in the wall to let water reach the sensing element, while the three pressure sensors are recessed more tightly since their smaller housings don't need the same flow path. Temperature sensors are mounted against the inner wall of the housing rather than exposed directly — heat conducts through the aluminium wall quickly enough to track ambient seawater temperature, without punching another hole through the pressure boundary.

Internally, a sliding frame carries the PCB, battery, and charging electronics on a track that prevents rotation during assembly — so the whole electronics stack can be built, tested, and slid into the shell as a single unit.

Overall Length
~370mm
domed ends
Outer Diameter
120mm
140mm at flanges
Internal Diameter
90–100mm
narrowest–widest
Housing Sections
3
threaded, single-rotation

How the housing goes together

A short render walkthrough of the three-section housing coming together — bottom cap, centre body, and top cap — showing how the modular split keeps assembly and servicing straightforward.

Sensor selection, driven by low-power duty cycling

Every sensor was chosen against the same three criteria: measurement range and accuracy against the design requirements, suitability for intermittent low-power sampling (since the system needs to run a year on a small local reserve), and unit cost — since redundant triplicate sensors were used for pressure and temperature rather than a single higher-spec part.

Pressure ×3
MS5837-30BA
Selected over the MS5803-30BA and Blue Robotics Bar100 for its 0–30 bar range (matched, not over-specified), sub-µA standby current for duty cycling, and lowest unit cost of the three (£8.10 vs £27.52 / £209.05).
Temperature ×3
DS18B20
A 1-Wire digital thermometer accurate to ±0.5°C. Three sensors share a single microcontroller pin over the 1-Wire bus, keeping the wiring simple inside a space-constrained dry housing.
Conductivity ×1
Atlas EZO-EC probe
The only option meeting the full seawater range (5–200,000 µS/cm) at ±2% accuracy, with digital temperature compensation and multi-point calibration — depth-rated to 352m.

Redundant sealing at every pressure boundary

Every joint in the housing — the two cap threads and the cable entry — is a potential failure point at 30 bar, so each was treated as its own sealing problem. The caps thread onto the centre body using a single-rotation thread profile, chosen specifically so an operator can't over-rotate the cap and shear the internal wiring during reassembly at sea.

O-ring material is CR (Neoprene) at ~70 Shore A — a general-purpose hardness with good long-term resistance to saltwater and UV exposure — sized against the Parker O-ring handbook for each probe diameter. An L-seal backs up the primary O-ring at the higher-pressure interfaces to resist seal extrusion under sustained load.

Cable entry uses a Blue Robotics WetLink Penetrator: a compression-gland fitting that seals the tether jacket directly, sized to a 4.5mm seal on an M10 bulkhead to match the four-core power/data cable. It's rated well beyond the 300m operating depth, which was a deliberate margin rather than a minimum spec.

CAD render of an isolated end cap showing the O-ring channel
Fig. 3 — End cap with double O-ring channel, sized against the Parker O-ring handbook for the housing bore diameter.

Confirming a stable, near-neutral buoyancy

A slightly negative buoyancy was a deliberate design target — enough residual weight to hang stably below the tether without inducing dynamic slack, but not so much that it loads the cable excessively. With the housing volume and mass fixed by the mechanical design, this was checked analytically rather than by assumption.

Buoyancy check
Buoyant force, using ρsw = 1,025 kg/m³:
Fb = ρsw V g = 1,025 × 0.0036 × 9.81 = 36.20 N
Weight in air, at ρCTD = 1,275 kg/m³:
W = mg = 4.5906 × 9.81 = 45.03 N
Fnet = Fb − W = −8.83 N (downward) → ~880g residual weight
Exploded CAD render of the CTD showing all housing and internal components
Fig. 4 — Full exploded assembly. Housing volume (0.0036m³) and mass (4.59kg) were fixed by this geometry, giving a density of ~1,275 kg/m³ — within the 1,100–1,400 kg/m³ target band.

A hybrid power split between buoy and pod

The buoy's 4×100W solar array and 200Ah battery bank supply power down a 4-conductor tether, which the CTD converts locally to regulated 5V and 3.3V rails for the electronics. A local 3,500mAh battery and solar-charging board give the pod roughly a month of autonomy on its own reserve — resilience against a tether or telemetry interruption rather than the primary supply.

Data takes the same layered approach: the Raspberry Pi Pico logs to onboard SD card via SPI, and pushes readings to the buoy over an RS-485 link — chosen over a simple UART for its noise immunity across the length of tether involved. The buoy relays compressed summaries to shore by satellite, while the CTD's local card retains full-resolution data as a backup against any comms dropout.

Local Battery
3,500mAh
3.7V, ~1 month autonomy
Regulated Rails
5V / 3.3V
from 12V tether bus
Uplink Protocol
RS-485
differential, noise-resistant
Sampling Range
10⁻⁴–1 Hz
duty-cycled
Onboard Storage
SD Card
SPI, full-resolution backup
Control
Pi Pico
+ I2C multiplexer

Cost-aware component selection

With a £500-per-unit manufacturing target in the design specification, sensor selection and cable routing were the two categories under the most scrutiny — the triplicated pressure and temperature sensors added redundancy without pushing the CTD hardware total past ~£1,081.

CategoryComponentsCost
Sensors3× DS18B20, 3× MS5837-30BA, 1× conductivity probe£186.73
Electronics & ControlEZO-EC circuit, PDB, voltage converter, Pi Pico£66.34
Housing MaterialPressure housing, caps, internal bracket£8.89
Power SupplyBattery, charging board£27.94
SealingEPDM O-rings, sensor seals£1.24
Connection Cable300m reinforced cable, WetLink penetrator, cable grip£790.00
CTD Hardware Total£1,081.14
ManufacturingPrinting, machining, assembly allowance£350.00
Project Totalexcluding buoy£1,431.14

Assembly detail

What I'd revisit next iteration

01
Cable cost dominates the budget
At £790, the reinforced 300m tether and its penetrator hardware account for over half the total project cost — more than the sensors, electronics, and housing combined. A shorter-range variant or a acoustic/inductive data link would be worth costing against the cable in a future revision.
02
Aluminium trades mass for corrosion margin
6061-T6 anodised aluminium was chosen for strength and machinability, but it sits at the heavier end of what the density target allows. A composite or engineering-plastic housing could shave mass and simplify the buoyancy calculation, at the cost of a more complex sealing interface.
03
Sensor triplication is a deliberate over-spec
Running three pressure and three temperature sensors in parallel — rather than one higher-accuracy unit — was chosen for redundancy and averaging at low incremental cost. It's the right call for a one-year unattended deployment, but it does add wiring and multiplexing complexity that a single premium sensor would avoid.
04
Single-rotation threads protect the wiring, but tighten tolerances
Limiting the cap threads to a single rotation was a good call for preventing wire damage during field servicing, but it does mean thread pitch and lead-in tolerances need to be held tightly in manufacture — worth flagging for the machinist rather than leaving to general tolerancing.

Performance against the design specification

The final design met every high-priority requirement from the product design specification — accurate multi-sensor measurement, pressure and corrosion resistance, a serviceable modular housing, and a total mass well under the 16kg handling limit — while keeping CTD hardware costs to roughly a fifth of the £500/unit manufacturing target once scaled.

Pressure Resistance
30.4 bar rating met with margin via thick-walled aluminium shell and threaded, sealed joints.
Corrosion Resistance
Anodised 6061-T6 aluminium body with fully sealed sensor and cable interfaces.
Mass & Handling
4.59kg — well within the 16kg two-person handling limit and the ≤500mm transport envelope.
Serviceability
Fully disassemblable in three sections; internal electronics slide out as one unit for maintenance.
Buoyancy
−8.83N net force confirms stable, near-neutral hanging orientation as intended.
Endurance
Designed for continuous year-round logging against a six-month maintenance interval.